Skip to main content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Government Website

Official websites use .gov
A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.

Safely connect using HTTPS

Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock () or https:// means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Audits, Inspections, and Evaluations

Report Number Title Issue Date Fiscal Year
OIG-10-106  

>Annual Review of the United States Coast Guard's Mission Performance (FY 2009) 		2010
OIG-09-13 Annual Review of the United States Coast Guard's Mission Performance (FY 2007) 2009
OIG-10-17 Annual Review of the United States Coast Guard's Mission Performance 2010
OIG-06-50 Annual Review of Mission Performance, United States Coast Guard (FY 2005) 2006
OIG-08-30 Annual Review of Mission Performance United States Coast Guard 2008
OIG-17-03 We determined that the maritime missions and responsibilities of the agencies are not duplicative and their efforts bolster the overall effectiveness of DHS maritime border security. Given the large area of responsibility, different activities, and limited resources, eliminating the maritime law enforcement responsibilities of either agency — or combining them — could be harmful to border security.  However, Air and Marine Operations and the Coast Guard could improve coordination in some areas.  DHS concurred with our two recommendations to improve oversight, and coordination of maritime operations.

>AMO and Coast Guard Maritime Missions Are Not Duplicative, But Could Improve with Better Coordination 		2017
OIG-10-108  

>Allegations of Misconduct within the Coast Guard Administrative Law Judge Program 		2010
OIG-07-23 Acquisition of the National Security Cutter, U.S. Coast Guard, 2007
OIG-07-27 110'/123' Maritime Patrol Boat Modernization Project, United States Coast Guard 2007
OIG-17-58-UNSUM Since our fiscal year 2015 evaluation, the Office of Intelligence and Analysis (I&A) has continued to provide effective oversight of DHS’ department-wide intelligence system and implemented programs for ongoing monitoring of its security practices. In addition, I&A has relocated its intelligence system to a DHS data center to improve network resiliency and support. The United States Coast Guard (USCG) has migrated its sites that process Top Secret/Sensitive Compartmented Information to a Defense Intelligence Agency owned system. However, USCG must continue to work with the Defense Intelligence Agency to clearly define the oversight responsibilities for this external system that supports its intelligence operations. We identified deficiencies in DHS’ information security program and are making two recommendations to I&A and three recommendations to USCG. I&A concurred with its two recommendations, while USCG non-concurred with its three recommendations. We conducted this review between May and September 2016.

>(U) Annual Evaluation of DHS' INFOSEC Program (Intel Systems - DHS Intelligence and Analysis) for FY 2016 		2017
OIG-10-107  

> Recommendations to Improve the USCG's System for Adjudicating Suspension and Revocation Matters 		2010
OIG-08-43 Independent Review of The U.S. Coast Guard's Reporting of FY 2007 Drug Control Performance Summary 2008
OIG-06-27 Independent Review of The U.S. Coast Guard's Reporting of FY 2005, Drug Control Funds 2006
OIG-10-105  

> Funding Plan for the United States Coast Guard Museum 		2010

*NDAA, Pub. L. 117-263, section 5274 Response Received. View responses

Return to top of page