Skip to main content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Government Website

Official websites use .gov
A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.

Safely connect using HTTPS

Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock () or https:// means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Audits, Inspections, and Evaluations

Report Number Title Issue Date Fiscal Year
OIG-08-23 Review of FEMA's Use of Proceeds From the Sales of Emergency Housing Unit 2008
GC-TX-06-32 Review of Hurricane Katrina Activities City of Austin, Texas 2006
GC-MS-06-25 Review of Hurricane Katrina Activities City of Biloxi, Mississippi, MS Area Field Office 2006
GC-MS-06-28 Review of Hurricane Katrina Activities City of D'Iberville, Mississippi Field Office 2006
GC-TX-06-58 Review of Hurricane Katrina Activities City of Houston, Texas 2006
GC-TX-06-26 Review of Hurricane Katrina Activities City of San Antonio, Texas 2006
GC-MS-06-36 Review of Hurricane Katrina Activities City of Wiggins, Mississippi 2006
GS-LA-06-57 Review of Hurricane Katrina Activities Congressional Inquiry, Contingency Payment of Contractors in St. Tammany Parish, Louisiana 2006
GC-MS-06-37 Review of Hurricane Katrina Activities Dixie Electric Power Association 2006
GC-HQ-06-53 Review of Hurricane Katrina Activities FEMA Disaster No. 1603-DR-LA City of New Orleans, Louisiana Appeal Process for Residential Damage Assessments 2006
GC-MS-06-49 Review of Hurricane Katrina Activities Magnolia Electric Power Association 2006
GC-MS-06-47 Review of Hurricane Katrina Activities Pearl River County, Mississippi 2006
GC-MS-06-48 Review of Hurricane Katrina Activities Stone County, Mississippi 2006
DA-07-07 Review of Hurricane Katrina Activities, Alabama Department of Conservation and Natural Resources, FEMA Disaster No. 1605-DR-AL, 2011
DA_07-02 Review of Hurricane Katrina Activities, City of Gulfport, MS, FEMA Disaster No. 1604-DR-MS, 2007
DA-07-05 Review of Hurricane Katrina Activities, Hancock County, Mississippi, FEMA Disaster No. 1604-DR-MS, ( 2007
DA-07-08 Review of Hurricane Katrina Activities, Jones County, Mississippi, FEMA Disaster 1604-DR-MS, 2007
DA-09-18  

>Review of Hurricane Katrina and Wilma Activities for Broward County, Florida 		2009
GC-AL-06-20 Review of Hurricane Katrina Contract City of Bayou La Batre, Alabama 2006
GC-AL-06-16 Review of Hurricane Katrina Contracts Baldwin County, Alabama 2006
GC-AL-06-22 Review of Hurricane Katrina Contracts City of Daphne, Alabama 2006
GC-AL-06-21 Review of Hurricane Katrina Contracts City of Fairhope, Alabama 2006
GC-AL-06-27 Review of Hurricane Katrina Contracts City of Orange Beach, Alabama 2006
DD-07-10 Review of Hurricane Katrina Debris Removal Activities St Tammany Parish, Louisiana, FEMA Disaster No. 1603-DR-LA, Public Assistance ID No. 087-99087-00, 2007
DD-07-11 Review of Hurricane Katrina Debris Removal Activities, Washington Parish, LA, FEMA Disaster No.1603-DR-LA, Public Assistance ID No. 117-99117-00, 2007
GC-AL-06-38 Review of Hurricane Katrina Debris Removal Contract City of Tuscaloosa, Alabama 2006
GC-FL-06-50 Review of Hurricane Wilma Activities City of Fort Lauderdale, Florida 2006
GC-FL-06-44 Review of Hurricane Wilma Activities City of Plantation, Florida 2006
GC-FL-06-39 Review of Hurricane Wilma Activities Collier County, Florida 2006
GC-FL-06-33 Review of Hurricane Wilma Activities Miami-Dade County, Florida 2006
GC-FL-06-42 Review of Hurricane Wilma Activities Saint Lucie County, Florida 2006
GC-FL-06-30 Review of Hurricane Wilma Activities Solid Waste Authority of Palm Beach County, Florida 2006
DA-07-12 Review of Hurricane Wilma Activities, City of Pembroke Pines, FL, Public Assistance ID No. 011-55775-00, FEMA Disaster No. 1609-DR-FL, 2007
DA-07-04 Review of Hurricane Wilma Activities, City of Port Saint Lucie, Florida, FEMA Disaster No. 1609-DR-FL, 2007
OIG-08-54 Review of Immigration and Customs Enforcement Detainee Telephone Services Contract 2008
OIG-09-108  

>Review of Immigration and Customs Enforcement's Expenditure Plan 		2009
OIG-10-56  

>Review of Management Agreements Developed for DHS' Primary Data Center 		2010
OIG-10-27 Review of Selected Personnel Practices at Maryland's National Processing Service Center 2010
DA_08-04 Review of Southern Pine Electric Power Association, Public Assistance ID No. 00-UGHQ2-00, FEMA Disaster No. 1604-DR-MS 2008
OIG-07-59 Review of the Buffer Zone Protection Program 2007
OIG-16-142 Title IV, Section 406 of the Cybersecurity Act of 2015 requires Inspectors General to assess agency National Security Systems (NSS) and other systems that provide access to personally identifiable information (PII). We reviewed information security policies and practices for logical access and data protection at the Department of Homeland Security in four key areas, asrequired by the Act.

>Review of the Department of Homeland Security's Implementation of the Cybersecurity Act of 2015 		2016
OIG-10-102  

>Review of the Department of Homeland Security's Master List of Recovery Act Contracts and Grants 		2010
OIG-11-117  

>Review of the Department of Homeland Security’s Capability to Share Cyber Threat Information (Redacted) 		2011
OIG-21-49 We found Border Patrol provided adequate medical assistance to the mother and her newborn, and complied with applicable policies. However, we found that Border Patrol’s data about pregnant detainees is limited and the agency lacks the necessary processes and guidance to reliably track childbirths that occur in custody. In addition, our review of a sample of childbirths in custody showed Border Patrol did not always take prompt action to expedite the release of U.S. citizen newborns, resulting in some being held in stations for multiple days and nights. Although some of these instances may have been unavoidable, Border Patrol needs reliable practices to expedite releases because holding U.S. citizen newborns at Border Patrol stations poses health, safety, and legal concerns. Lastly, we found that Border Patrol agents do not have guidelines on interpreting for Spanish-speaking detainees at hospitals. As a result, an agent assigned to hospital watch for the detainee provided interpretation that may not have comported with CBP’s language access guidance. We made four recommendations to improve CBP’s processes for tracking detainee childbirths, its practices for expediting release of U.S. citizen newborns, and its guidance to agents on providing interpretation for detainees. CBP concurred with all four recommendations

>Review of the February 16, 2020 Childbirth at the Chula Vista Border Patrol Station 		2021
DA-08-02 Review of the Hurricane Katrina Activities for City of Pascagoula, MS, Public Assistance ID No. 059-55360-00, FEMA Disaster No. 1604-DR-MS 2008
OIG-05-50 Review of the Immigration and Customs Enforcement's, Compliance Enforcement Unit 2005
OIG-11-13 Review of the National Bio and Agro-Defense Facility Site Selection Process 2011
OIG-05-10 Review of the Port Security Grant Program 2005
DD-06-01 Review of the Proposed Interagency Housing Agreement with the Department of Veterans Affairs 2006
OIG-11-15 Review of the Quality of Data Submitted by Department of Homeland Security Recipients of American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 Funds ( 2011

*NDAA, Pub. L. 117-263, section 5274 Response Received. View responses

Return to top of page